Author Topic: Front loader washers compared to top loaders  (Read 716 times)

Offline go400

  • Technician
  • Member Since: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 290
  • Country: us
Front loader washers compared to top loaders
« on: March 19, 2013, 07:08:35 AM »
I read a report that stated front loaders consume 48% less energy per year than top loaders and get the cloths dryer.
 However there are some negatives:
 1) they run generally twice as long and do not get badly soiled cloths clean
 2) they will cost more to maintain and will need total replacement after more than 6 years of operation
 3) The 3 phase motor is less than 1/3 hp and the unit will drop out if too many cloths are put in.
 4) they usually are more difficult to repair and it will take longer to find a qualified service person
 5) More prone to pump failures and lint clogs

 Any thoughts on this.
 

Offline AJ

  • Technician
    Administrator
  • Member Since: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 9390
  • Country: us
    • ApplianceJunk.com - Appliance Repair
Re: Front loader washers compared to top loaders
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2013, 08:33:09 AM »
Back when I did sales along with repairs it was easy to sell front loaders by bringing up how much money they would save vs using a top loader.

Then when I would go out later to repair the same front loaders that I sold earlier I would think to myself as I made out the bills, "There goes any money they saved."

Customers seem to like how their new front loaders clean compared to their old washers through.

I do see more pump failures on front loaders, but looks how small them pumps and their little motors are compared to the old belt drive or direct drive pumps.
Hope you find our site helpful.

Offline go400

  • Technician
  • Member Since: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 290
  • Country: us
Re: Front loader washers compared to top loaders
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2013, 11:37:05 AM »
The Whirlpool Duet has a much more robust motor and motor drive. Measured high speed spin current ( total single phase into the motor drive) in excess of 4 amps, while others struggle at current over 3 amps.
 

Offline bigbuck

  • Technician
  • Member Since: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 953
  • Country: us
  • over 30 years repairing appliance
    • Buy me a beer through paypal
Re: Front loader washers compared to top loaders
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2013, 11:42:37 AM »
Probably top loaders due to last for 15 to 20 years. I have a 2003 whirlpool duet , only use 2 to 4 tablespoons of regular detergent in her since she was new. Only problem replaced fill valve about 6 months ago, due to slowly filling washer when not used.(well water) . Other then that she has been good. Being a technician & so many baskets & tubs I have changed ( only service plans) if they pay for the repair its $1200.00  just for parts.


So with the failures due to the bearings or the spider (pot metal junk) . I 'll go with top loaders.

 

Water Collecting in Boot on Select Frigidaire Front-Load Washers

Started by AJ

Replies: 1
Views: 4461
Last post August 05, 2013, 08:42:08 PM
by Cananot
LG recommended maintenance for front load washers

Started by maypo52

Replies: 5
Views: 19661
Last post June 03, 2014, 05:52:55 PM
by domain
Frigidaire front loader (MAGNET)

Started by chic

Replies: 3
Views: 4276
Last post April 16, 2008, 07:28:44 PM
by chic
Whirlpool duet front loader Control Locked light on

Started by nick11

Replies: 6
Views: 6713
Last post September 21, 2008, 04:18:42 PM
by Al Capone
Front Loading washers

Started by Big Bear

Replies: 8
Views: 2872
Last post September 22, 2008, 07:53:27 PM
by Big Bear
Front loader intermittently fills with water

Started by Junipergirl

Replies: 5
Views: 2434
Last post September 27, 2008, 02:26:44 PM
by Junipergirl